Search found 4 matches
- Thu Mar 26, 2015 7:25 pm
- Forum: Archived Public Forum - 2002 to 2023
- Topic: MI Vs Mounted Rifles - Australian Light Horse, belts vs stri
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3847
Long recoil doesn't seem appropriate / necessary for
small arms. While getting production variance down so that parts fit and cycling become reliable clearly doesn't hurt, but I think that the Chauchaut was simply a bad design, anyway.
- Thu Mar 26, 2015 2:53 pm
- Forum: Archived Public Forum - 2002 to 2023
- Topic: MI Vs Mounted Rifles - Australian Light Horse, belts vs stri
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3847
Re: MI Vs Mounted Rifles - Australian Light Horse, belts vs
Hi Pat,
The story of Crozier Vs Lewis and the gun, eh? USMC losing its .30-06 Lewis's for the Chauchat on arrival in France.
The BAR was clearly a better weapon than the Hotchkiss for a 'light automatic' the term the Indian army had for its Hotchkiss and VB gusn before WWII.
Good to be back.
Tim B
The story of Crozier Vs Lewis and the gun, eh? USMC losing its .30-06 Lewis's for the Chauchat on arrival in France.
The BAR was clearly a better weapon than the Hotchkiss for a 'light automatic' the term the Indian army had for its Hotchkiss and VB gusn before WWII.
Good to be back.
Tim B
- Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:54 pm
- Forum: Archived Public Forum - 2002 to 2023
- Topic: MI Vs Mounted Rifles - Australian Light Horse, belts vs stri
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3847
MI Vs Mounted Rifles - Australian Light Horse, belts vs stri
have Jean Bou's book about the ALH and in it he states that the term MR was used to distinguish ALH as troops trained in cavalry roles, flank guard, rear guard, advance guard, reconnaissance, listening posts, etc. but without the Arme Blanche and reliant on fire power- from mere infantry who have ...
- Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:10 pm
- Forum: Archived Public Forum - 2002 to 2023
- Topic: cavalry machine gun squadrons
- Replies: 57
- Views: 44076