The McClellan series of saddles sported these ornaments as well, with many variations being made during the Civil War. The ‘Pattern of 1859’ equipment was very new, and production had been limited to relatively small orders from a few contractors. Arsenal production of the new equipment in 1860 was very small – St. Louis had made a few dozen bridle escutcheons, Frankford was basically inspecting and accepting deliveries from the local saddlery contractors (850) and made a few metal specification patterns, with Allegheny Arsenal just starting to produce the new McClellan set (503 in 1860).
The McClellan series was made in three different sizes – 11″, 11 1/2″, 12″. This measurement was the straight-line distance from the point where pommel and cantle meet the sidebar, along the inner edge of the sidebar (see below). A ‘1’ marking corresponded to the 11″ seat, the ‘2’ to the 11 1/2″ and the ‘3’ to the 12″ seat.
The confusing aspect of this number sizing system is that there are lots of plates that have the actual size clearly embossed on them, and this full-text embossing was continued for the rest of the lifetime of the McClellan series. How this change came about was a bit mysterious until an article was found in the first issue of the ‘United Service Magazine’ – one Capt. Joseph Ash wrote a detailed critique of the horse equipment then being issued, and many heretofore unknown details were revealed.
One of great interest here was his observation that ‘numbered plate’ saddles were arsenal production, and full-text size plates were used for contractor produced equipment. Written mid-war, this gives a useful insight to early and mid-war saddles – late war arsenal production changed in some ways, but that’s another story.
A small display of numbered shields, showing that stamps were varied in both size and font – apparently whatever was readily available.
The unusual outlier for the arsenal shields were those found on Allegheny Arsenal saddles. This arsenal used a very specific type of pommel shield for the first few years of the war, bearing the size stamp, the name of the arsenal, and the date of manufacture. Following is a small collection of images of original Allegheny Arsenal pommel plates. I’ve yet to see an ‘1862’ – ‘1861’ is quite common, and there are examples from 1863. Changes in the Ordnance Department specifications regarding the manufacture of saddle trees appears to have led to changes that caused these arsenal-specific plates to be dropped. More on this in a later article.
A small collection of original Allegheny Arsenal pommel shields. Key points of interest are the small, fine, heavily ‘serif’-ed font. The last ‘1’ in ‘1861’ appears to be a slightly larger number, somewhat lower set than the other three. This characteristic is pretty uniform across all ‘1861’ Allegheny plates. Note that the slot for the coat strap is an oval, and not the more common square-ended rectangle. The size numeral is present on all specimens, in the center just above the coat strap slot.
Now, this Allegheny plate has been reproduced in various qualities, and here are some examples of reproductions. In general, most are easily spotted with the exception of one. The rectangular slot is the biggest giveaway for a reproduction. The one on the far right is the ‘dangerous’ one of the lot – as the lettering is close, the slot is correct. The font is not quite the same however, and the stamping of the lettering is much deeper and the die letters leave a heavier, thicker shape that is notable. The alignment of the letters is much more consistent than the originals – the ‘S’ in ‘Arsenal’ is very distinctive on the original arsenal stampings. The modern version is also a somewhat heavier gauge brass stock, and the backs will show the impression from the stamping – which usually isn’t noticeable on originals. Fraudulent offerings at places like eBay, for instance, will often have the size stamping below the date, which is never the case with originals. In most of these attempted frauds, the number stamp is significantly larger than the originals used at the arsenal.
On the opposite side of the supply chain, we have those examples of the full-text size embossed plates, most commonly associated with contractor manufactured saddles. Now, with the caveat that even the government arsenals began using these later in the war (1864, 1865), we’ll show some examples – the variety is much greater with these, which makes them interesting for the collector. The only consistencies for these contractor plates is that they were generally lighter weight brass stock, with lighter embossing than post-war types. This allowed the letters to be quite crisp around the edges, as they were did not deform the brass nearly as much as postwar embossing. I’ll be adding interesting variations to this as they are found.
1. United States congressional serial set. 1079 (1860/61), page 984.
2. United States congressional serial set. 1079 (1860/61), page 984.
3. United States congressional serial set. 1079 (1860/61), page 978.