HOME -->  STUDIES -->  Feature Stories and Articles     Back  

Case #4:

A "MINT Condition Civil War" McClellan Saddle


Recent events have presented us with a fine example of a purchasing mistake that can be visited upon the uninformed.  In this case, the piece had some very positive attributes, but was wholly misrepresented by the seller.  

This view shows some of the basic features of this saddle.  The tree or rawhide-covered seat appears to be a genuine CW era saddletree.  That's where the Civil War ends and the "post-CW" begins.  Note the skirts are only held on with about 1/2 the regulation number of  screws, arranged in a single row, instead of the normal double row.  The saddlerings are held with round wire staples, instead of the usual CW pattern flat iron staples, a post-CW period condition.  If you look at the stitching holding the quarterstraps to the dee ring, you'll note the one-piece "pointed" shape - this indicates machine work, and is typical of late 19th century saddlery.   The stirrups are typical late 19th century/early 20th century wood.

mis_saddle1.jpg (42604 bytes)

Note the position of the "Alleghany Arsenal" plate - these are usually located much closer to the quarterstrap, or even slightly underneath it.  From the looks of it, this plate was taken from another saddle (note the wear mark?  indicative of quarterstrap wear if in a more likely location) and placed on this one to cover up the original staple holes.   You can just see the edge of one peeking out at the top.  You can see where the replacement rear ring is located in the post 1885 position, under the cantle foot staple. 

mis_saddle2.jpg (41346 bytes)

Here's another nice view, that shows odd placement of arsenal id plate, single line of skirt screws.   There are no saddlebag staples on the rear quarterstraps, or any indication that there were ever any there.  No saddlebag stud.  This all indicates that the quarterstraps and skirts are post-CW period replacements. 

mis_saddle3.jpg (32638 bytes)

Assessment:
The seller insisted that this was a "mint" Civil War cavalry saddle, which it clearly is not.  The saddletree (wood and rawhide only) IS Civil War period from all appearances, but the leather is definitely a post war addition.  Much of the hardware may be old civil war pieces, but from placements, were likely added along with the leather when this surplus tree was rebuilt for resale.

This has the overall appearance of being a circa 1890-1910 rebuilt civil war surplus saddletree, commonly sold in the usual civilian saddlery sources of the time. 

Yes, the leather is old, but it ain't 135+ years old - more like 100 years old.

 Support the SMH! website by Mor-Kik