|
by Pat Holscher » Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:46 pm
These appear to be bandsmen, but I think that was the norm for the time depicted. The much shorter stirrups were a post WWI introduction. I don't think the size of the pack had anything to do with it. The pack remained comparable throughout the McClellan's period of service. Rather, longer stirrups were simply more the norm in the service prior to Caprilli's influence being felt. Even today some rough country riders ride with stirrups longer than the Ftl Riley type of seat would generally provide for. Most Western riders, for example, while not riding a super long stirrup, do not ride a very short one. This is not to discount the forward seat, or military seat, by any means. But the military seat of this ear is not what it would become after World War One.
Pat
Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?
-

Pat Holscher
-
- Posts: 25019
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2000 6:51 pm
- Location: USA
-
by Pat Holscher » Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:47 pm
Note also that the middle bandsmen has a shorter stirrup. Part of what we're seeing may simply be because these are bandsmen, but again, the military seat of the 30s isn't what these soldiers would have rode with.
Pat
Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?
-

Pat Holscher
-
- Posts: 25019
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2000 6:51 pm
- Location: USA
-
by Pat Holscher » Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:50 pm
Rick Throckmorton wrote:Tom, That is a Model 1912 Service Saddle shown in that photo. During the Punitive Expedition, it was in use by many companies within the various cavalry regiments deployed into Mexico and along the border. The regiments seem to be a mixed bag of companies using the Model 1912 equipments and companies using the McClellan equipments. Best, Rick T.
Bumped up on this item, given the thread on 1912s.
Pat
Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?
-

Pat Holscher
-
- Posts: 25019
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2000 6:51 pm
- Location: USA
-
by Pat Holscher » Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:32 pm
Interesting photograph of American artillery, from the Yale site Couvi found: http://brbl-images.library.yale.edu/WAP ... 066087.jpgNote the details of the rider on the right.
Pat
Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?
-

Pat Holscher
-
- Posts: 25019
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2000 6:51 pm
- Location: USA
-
by Couvi » Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:29 am
The gun and limber look like a 3” Gun, Model of 1902, but the mules pulling it are an aberration. The harness looks like escort wagon harness or common plow harness, but the saddle on the lead mule has a big horn. I cannot see enough of the saddle on the wheeler to tell, but the stirrups look like McClellan stirrups. There is an odd-looking saddle bag on the near wheeler and on the out-rider’s saddle. Note the steel stirrups on the saddle of the rider at right and that odd bridle that is commonly seen on mules, both riding and pack, of that period. Note, also, the cap badges of the individuals. These might be US Marine Corps. Didn’t they land at Vera Cruz?
Couvi
"Cavalier sans Cheval"
"Do not fear the enemy, for they can take only your life. Fear the media, for they will take your honor." Anonymous
-

Couvi
-
- Posts: 3256
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 9:30 am
- Location: Marlow, OK
by Couvi » Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:31 am
Note the long stirrups Pat mentioned in another post.
Couvi
"Cavalier sans Cheval"
"Do not fear the enemy, for they can take only your life. Fear the media, for they will take your honor." Anonymous
-

Couvi
-
- Posts: 3256
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 9:30 am
- Location: Marlow, OK
by Pat Holscher » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:11 pm
Couvi wrote:The gun and limber look like a 3” Gun, Model of 1902, but the mules pulling it are an aberration. The harness looks like escort wagon harness or common plow harness, but the saddle on the lead mule has a big horn. I cannot see enough of the saddle on the wheeler to tell, but the stirrups look like McClellan stirrups. There is an odd-looking saddle bag on the near wheeler and on the out-rider’s saddle. Note the steel stirrups on the saddle of the rider at right and that odd bridle that is commonly seen on mules, both riding and pack, of that period. Note, also, the cap badges of the individuals. These might be US Marine Corps. Didn’t they land at Vera Cruz?
They did land at Vera Cruz. I'll bet these are Marines. I wonder if they're Marines with a locally acquired set of mounts with some improvised tack set ups.
Pat
Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?
-

Pat Holscher
-
- Posts: 25019
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2000 6:51 pm
- Location: USA
-
by Pat Holscher » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:18 pm
Also, the rider with the hooded stirrups has the previous pattern of campaign hat. Photos of Marines in this period show that they hadn't all been issued the new campaign hat.
Pat
Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?
-

Pat Holscher
-
- Posts: 25019
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2000 6:51 pm
- Location: USA
-
by Pat Holscher » Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:05 pm
Bumped up for wagon photographs.
Pat
Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?
-

Pat Holscher
-
- Posts: 25019
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2000 6:51 pm
- Location: USA
-
by Pat Holscher » Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:19 am
Interesting photograph of Oklahoma Guardsmen with a locomotive. http://runyon.lib.utexas.edu/r/RUN02000 ... N02043.JPGI'm surprised by the apparent vintage of this locomotive. It looks older than this era, although I suppose locomotives had a pretty long shelf life.
Pat
Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?
-

Pat Holscher
-
- Posts: 25019
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2000 6:51 pm
- Location: USA
-
by Philip S » Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:51 am
Pat Holscher wrote:Interesting photograph of Oklahoma Guardsmen with a locomotive. http://runyon.lib.utexas.edu/r/RUN02000 ... N02043.JPGI'm surprised by the apparent vintage of this locomotive. It looks older than this era, although I suppose locomotives had a pretty long shelf life.
I have a photo of a similar locomotive made about 1880. The photo appears to be about 1900 so the locomotive would be older but still in the proper period. Smaller locomotives like this were often downgraded in service to lighter duty and lasted for many long years. Some even made it to WWII. The ballon stack was a filter for sparks. It is a nice picture too bad it cannot be enlarged.
-

Philip S
-
- Posts: 1974
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 9:26 am
- Location: State College, PA USA
by Pat Holscher » Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:24 am
Philip S wrote:Did you notice the Leg-o-Mutton gun case just to the right of the pole?
No I didn't. Not until you posted the reference to it.
Pat
Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?
-

Pat Holscher
-
- Posts: 25019
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2000 6:51 pm
- Location: USA
-
| |